Cases 81 - 90 of 150
Radford v. Crimi et al
as 6:2016cv06441
Plaintiff:
Barney J. Radford, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Crimi, Josehp Crimi, Monroe County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge et al
as 1:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Roosevelt Smith, Elizabeth Buckley, Sandra Doorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Dutchess County Clerk's Office et al
as 1:2015cv08923
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo D. Harris
Defendant:
Dutchess County Clerk's Office, State of New York, Dutchess County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Matter of Admission of Elizabeth K. Quinn
as 2:2015mc00092
Movant:
Federal Public Defender for the District of Vermont
Harris v. Dutchess County Clerk's Office et al
as 6:2015cv06560
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo D. Harris
Defendant:
Dutchess County Clerk's Office, State of New York, Dutchess County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Johnson v. United States, U.S., 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015)
as 2:2015mc00082
Movant:
Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Vermont
Respondent:
United States of America
Bussie v. Federal Public Defender Organization
as 1:2015cv04722
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
Federal Public Defender Organization
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hannon v. Chief Public Defender et al
as 3:2015cv00418
Plaintiff:
Michael Hannon
Defendant:
Chief Public Defender, John Day, William Adsit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gulifield v. Donahue et al
as 1:2015cv00885
Plaintiff:
Jashaad Gulifield
Defendant:
Brendan Donahue, Kristen Conklin, Robert Shine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Elizabeth K. Quinn
as 2:2015mc00002
Movant:
Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Vermont
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
