Cases 1 - 10 of 73
HAZAN SPORTS MANAGEMENT GROUP INC. v. Johnson
as 1:2024cv04574
Plaintiff:
HAZAN SPORTS MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
Defendant:
Akeem J Johnson
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 203 Jurisdiction; amount in controversy
United States of America v. Artis (Campbell)
as 24-922
Defendant:
MALIK CAMPBELL, SOLOMON ARTIS, LEONARD BARLETTO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McIntosh et al v. Jabco Contracting Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08105
Plaintiff:
Jahleel McIntosh and Akeem Corbin
Defendant:
Jabco Contracting Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Newton v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01332
Plaintiff:
Rashod Akeem Newton
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. PVH Corp.
as 22-2738
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cameron Warren
Defendant:
PVH Corp., Stephan Larsson, Ben Preuss and others
Haynes et al v. EIA Electric, Inc.
as 1:2022cv08645
Plaintiff:
Akeem Haynes, Jason Pascall, Nkosi Doyle and others
Defendant:
EIA Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Cardoza v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv04872
Petitioner:
Mr. Akeem Cardoza and Akeem Cardoza
Respondent:
The City of New York, Louis Molina Correction Commissioner and The New York City Department Of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. United States of America
as 22-1652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Akeem Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
United States of America v. Artis (Passley)
as 22-1368
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Solomon Artis, AKA Light, AKA Spaz, Leonard Barletto, AKA Boots, Courtney Coy, AKA Styles and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Cordero Passley, AKA Looney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
