Cases 1 - 10 of 1,736
Dees v. Zurlo
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN DEES and ETHAN DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
JILLIAN KNOX, SAMUAL MAXWELL, EMILY WILLIAMS and others
Flores v. Vang et al
as 1:2024cv04536
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Flores
Defendant:
Amber Vang, Sacramento Family Justice Center, Unknown and others
Debtor:
Rebecca Irwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Junior-Tony Dieujuste v. Sin
as 24-1522
Plaintiff:
JUNIOR-TONY DIEUJUSTE
Defendant:
JESSICA SIN and KEISHA KEARSE, all successors and assigns
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Reyes v. JJ Chan's Garden Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03861
Plaintiff:
Alberto Reyes
Defendant:
JJ Chan's Garden Inc. and Jessica Ly Kong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Clark et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2024cv03962
Plaintiff:
Jessica Clark and J. C.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davolio et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03917
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Diane Davolio, Julie Dils, Edward Ehlers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
