Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Klarman v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv05340
Defendant:
NYPD P.O. John and Jane Does, NYPD Sergeant Muneeb Shahbaz, NYPD P.O. Sasha Cabrera and others
Plaintiff:
Summer Klarman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maher v. Johnson
as 24-2068
Defendant:
GLOBAL FACTORS, LLC and RALPH C. JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
MARY E. MAHER RESIDUARY TRUST and DENNIS P. MAHER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05900
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. McKenzie
as 24-1787
Defendant:
KHAA MCKENZIE, CHRISTIAN KESTON JOHN, MICHAEL FARMER and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stokes et al v. Slayton et al
as 5:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Shane T. Stokes, Sr. and Susan C. Johnson
Defendant:
James Slayton, Roger Anthony, Matthew Androsko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gross v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gross
Defendant:
James C Johnson and County of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sony Music Entertainment et al
as 1:2023cv10369
Plaintiff:
Sheri C. Johnson
Defendant:
Sony Music Publishing(US) LLC and Alyssa Michelle Stephens d/b/a Mulatto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Johnson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv06245
Plaintiff:
Kareem C. Johnson
Defendant:
The City of New York, Sgt. Burgher and NYPD Officers 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mellema v. VanOort et al
as 1:2023cv05883
Plaintiff:
Richard Mellema
Defendant:
Douglas M. VanOort, Mark W. Mallon, Kathryn B. McKenzie and others
Nominal Defendant:
NeoGenomics, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
