Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Alcala v. Popular Bank
as 1:2024cv03652
Plaintiff:
Luis Alcala
Defendant:
Popular Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alcala v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Luis Alcala
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Carvajal-Barrios (Alcala Cordones)
as 24-1152
Defendant:
HUGO ARMANDO CARVAJAL-BARRIOS, LUCIANO MARIN ARANGO, SEUXIS PAUCIS HERNANDEZ SOLARTE and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alcala v. Office of Crime Victim Services
as 1:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
Luis Alcala
Defendant:
Office of Crime Victim Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alcala v. Office of Crime Victims Services
as 1:2023cv09507
Plaintiff:
Luis Alcala
Defendant:
Office of Crime Victims Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Benjamin et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv05458
Plaintiff:
Albert-Ann Benjamin, Ronnie Ford, Yoshica Smalls and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Nadine Dyer-Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alcala v. United States Post Office et al
as 1:2022cv02979
Plaintiff:
Luis Alcala
Defendant:
United States Post Office and James Farley Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alcala v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited
as 1:2021cv03114
Defendant:
Tata Consultancy Services Limited
Plaintiff:
Luis Alcala
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alcala v. Fareportal Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07274
Defendant:
Fareportal Inc. and Shailesh Jain
Plaintiff:
Luis Alcala
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Deaza-Alcala v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv07285
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ramirez Deaza-Alcala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
