Cases 1 - 10 of 2,578
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1337
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Peterkin v. Carr
as 24-1148
Plaintiff:
MEURIS PETERKIN
Defendant:
DOUGLAS CARR, JOSE ALBARRACIN, TAMARA WILLIAMS and others
Whitfield v. Buechler et al
as 1:2024cv03176
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Kenneth F. Buechler, Ph.D., Evelyn S. Dilsaver, Edward L. Michael and others
Douglas et al v. Walmart et al
as 7:2024cv03030
Plaintiff:
Willoughby Douglas and Lovecora Douglas
Defendant:
WALMART, Kelly G Moorer, Jr., Rory J Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Authors Guild v. OpenAI Inc.
as 24-1007
Plaintiff:
AUTHORS GUILD, DAVID BALDACCI, NICHOLAS A. BASBANES and others
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, OPENAI, INC., OPENAI LP and others
Not Yet Classified:
PAUL TREMBLAY, MICHAEL CHABON, TA-NEHISI COATES and others
Madera v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02903
Plaintiff:
Antonio Madera
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Craig W. Tiejen, William Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 267
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bristol County Retirement System v. QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02804
Plaintiff:
Bristol County Retirement System
Defendant:
QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation, Douglas Bryant, Joseph Busky and others
Harris v. City National Bank et al
as 6:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Shai Harris and Jay Williams Living Trust Dated
Defendant:
City National Bank, Andrew Adrian Dioli, RushMyFile, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
