Cases 1 - 6 of 6
In Re: American Express Anti-S
as 20-1766
Plaintiff:
National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Intervenor:
Gander Mountain Company, Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Holiday Companies and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Qwik Lube LLC and LaJolla Auto Tech, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc,
Defendant:
Susan Burdette
In Re: American Express Anti-S
as 20-580
Plaintiff:
National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cohen Rese Gallery, Inc., Lopez-Dejonge, Inc., Jasa, Inc., on behalf of themselves and others
Intervenor:
Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Gander Mountain Company, Holiday Companies and others
Defendant / Appellee:
American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc, and American Express Company
Defendant:
Susan Burdette
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust
as 19-754
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 21 Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Health Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., FKA Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Barr Laboratories Inc., a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Pipefitters Union Local NO 537 Health & Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Welfare Plan of the International Union of Operation Engineers Locals 137, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137R, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., an Israeli Corporation
United States of America v. American Express Company
as 15-1672
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Maryland, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Mastercard International Incorporated and Visa Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Joseph Gregory Sidak, Esq., Robert D Willig, David J Teece and others
Movant:
Home Depot USA, Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc., Academy, Ltd., DBA Academy Sports + Outdoors and others
United States of America v. American Express Company
as 15-1672
Amicus Curiae:
Michael A. Carrier, Law Professor, Bridgestone Americas Inc., Nestle Waters North America Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Saks Incorporated, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Ohio and others
Defendant / Appellant:
American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. and American Express Company
Defendant:
Visa Inc. and Mastercard International Incorporated
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02516
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
In Re:
Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Operating Engineers Local 312 Health and Welfare Trust, A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Buildings Trade Welfare Plan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company
Claimant:
Lonny DiTella
Interested Party:
Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc., PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc., Aetna Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Generic Pharmaceutical Association
Cause Of Action: MDL 2516 In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
