Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,838
Hartmann v. Inari Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04662
Plaintiff: Paul Hartmann
Defendant: Inari Medical, Inc., William Hoffman, Andrew Hykes and others
Siegriest v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00666
Plaintiff: Andrew Siegriest
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Valles v. United States of America
as 24-1596
Petitioner: ANDREW VALLES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff: Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant: Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prokos v. Long Island City Business Improvement District, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04219
Plaintiff: Andrew Prokos
Defendant: Long Island City Business Improvement District, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Breda v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01031
Plaintiff: Andrew John Breda, Jr.
Defendant: John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanks et al v. PerryGreen, Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv04189
Plaintiff: Jermaine Hanks, Ryan Leak and Andrew Saviolis
Defendant: PerryGreen, Ltd., Randy Perry, Marjorie Perry and others
Birch v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv01025
Plaintiff: Michael Andrew Birch
Defendant: Angel Quiros, Martin, Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarecki et al v. Manongsong Contracting LLC et al
as 7:2024cv04425
Plaintiff: Andrew Jarecki, TAT IV Trust and ARJ Family Real Estate LLC
Defendant: Manongsong Contracting LLC and Domingo Manongsong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Murphy v. County of Chemung
as 24-1534
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER M. MURPHY, JR., -
Defendant: WILLIAM WASHBURN, COUNTY OF CHEMUNG, CITY OF ELMIRA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?