Cases 1 - 10 of 19
McCloud, Jr. v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv08341
Plaintiff:
Armond McCloud, Jr.
Defendant:
City of New York, Carlos Gonzalez, Marianne Herbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Pocesta et al
as 1:2022cv03548
Plaintiff:
Theresa Rodriguez
Defendant:
Gazmen Pocesta, Manuel Pocesta and Armond Pocesta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McCloud v. Doe
as 20-542
Defendant:
A. Olles and Sargeant Shepanksi
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Armond McCloud
Defendant / Appellee:
J. Griffen, Correctional Officer at the Attica Corr. Fae in his official and individual capacity, Albert Prack, Director of Special Housing and Mark Bradt, Former Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility in his official and individual capacity, Newly Joined
Anderson et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv00354
Plaintiff:
Armond Rhian Cox, Eileen Shipsey, Ashley Nicole Rodenheiser and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
McCloud v. Ursiler et al
as 9:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Armond McCloud
Defendant:
Ursiler and Darren T. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar et al v. Torres et al
as 1:2015cv04430
Defendant:
Armond Torres, 43 West 24th St. Rest. LLC and Richard Sandoval
Plaintiff:
Daniel Salazar and Yamz Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCloud v. Doe et al
as 6:2014cv06253
Plaintiff:
Armond McCloud
Defendant:
John Doe, Mark Bradt, J. Griffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. City of Utica
as 14-706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Julianne Burns and Christopher Burns
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Utica, Linda Fatata, Ind. and as City of Utica Coporation Counsel, Michael Knapp, Ind. and as a Firefighter Employed by the City of Utica Fire Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
