Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jimenez v. The City of New York
as 24-323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN J. JIMENEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEW YORK, HUGH BOGLE, DERBY WANCCIQUE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Corbett v. Hochul
as 22-3210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jonathan Corbett
Defendant / Appellee:
Kathleen Hochul, in her official capacity as chief executive of the State of New York, Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Eric Adams, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of New York and others
Mohamed Chbani v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06432
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Chbani
Defendant:
Epizyme, Inc., Michael F. Giordano, Pablo Legorreta and others
Johnson v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06294
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Epizyme, Inc., Grant Bogle, David M. Mott and others
Savage v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06165
Plaintiff:
Alexander Savage
Defendant:
Epizyne, Inc., Grant Bogle, David M. Mott and others
Carzoglio v. Abrams
as 22-1553
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Angelo A. Carzoglio
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas Abrams, Former Senior Jail Guard Supervisor(Captain) and Westchester County
Defendant:
Karl Vollmer, Chief Administrative Officer, Sgt. Middleton, #196, Jail Guard Supervisor, Sgt. I. Lopez and others
Nguyen v. Epizyme, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06091
Plaintiff:
Michael Nguyen
Defendant:
Epizyme, Inc., Ken Bate, Roy A. Beveridge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
