Cases 1 - 10 of 552
Pawlowski v. Easter et al
as 3:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
Edwin Pawlowski
Defendant:
D. Easter and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laster v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv05837
Respondent:
Grand Prairie, Allenwood F.C.I, Warren Baraza, Probation Department (Federal), United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Shermaine Laster
Defendant:
Grand Prairie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DuBose v. The United States of America et al
as 9:2024cv01023
Defendant:
F.C.I. Raybrook, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Zumar DuBose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dubose v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 9:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Zumar DuBose
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Churuk v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Yaroslav Churuk
Respondent:
Warden and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Encarnacion-Lafontaine v. Warden
as 24-1971
Respondent:
EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WARDEN, WARDEN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Petitioner:
EDGAR ENCARNACION-LAFONTAINE
Samsel v. Peters et al
as 1:2024cv05027
Defendant:
Ronald Davis, Metropolitan Detention Center Brooklyn Federal Bureau of Prisons, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Samsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DuBose v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 9:2024cv00877
Defendant:
F.C.I. Ray Brook and Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Zumar DuBose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cicchiello v. Peters
as 24-1865
Respondent:
R. STOVER, Warden, Danbury and COLETTE PETERS, Director Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
JOAN CICCHIELLO
Gomez v. Cullen
as 24-1455
Defendant:
GEORGE ROBINSON, J.B. FOSTER, HSA, K. SORRELL and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE GOMEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
