Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Schwab et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Charles Schwab and Roxanne Schwab
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen, et. al., All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC, All Contract Rights, Interest in and any Payments due on Michael Luehrsens 10% Class A membership interest in C3 Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Mullen Automotive, Inc. et al v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07647
Plaintiff:
Mullen Automotive, Inc. and Ulysses Novoa
Defendant:
TD Ameritrade, Inc., Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVCIES, LLC and others
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Boston Retirement System
as 23-709
Petitioner:
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Lenoard Bell, David L. Hallal and others
Respondent:
Boston Retirement System, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Erste Asset Management GmbH, Public Employee Retirement System of Idaho and others
Boston Retirement System v. Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02127
Defendant:
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Leonard Bell, David L. Hallal and others
Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement System
Petitioner:
Steamship Trade Association-International Longshoremen's Association Pension Fund, Gwinnett County Public Employees Retirement System, Erste-Sparinvest Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH and others
Intervenor:
The Alger Funds and Charles Schwab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
USA v. Contents of Charles Schwab Individual Retirement Account Ending in 8880 et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Contents of Charles Schwab Individual Retirement Account Ending in 8880 and Contents of Savings Bank of Danbury Account Ending 9033
Claimant:
Gregory Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al v. First Republic Bank et al
as 1:2011cv09572
Defendant:
Weintraub Capital Management, L.P., Florence S. Bradshaw, Board of Trustees of the Directors Guild of America-Producer Pension Plan, as administrator of the directors guild of America-Producer Pension Plan Basic Benefit Plan and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Enhanced RAFI (R) US Large, L.P.(sued herein as Research Affiliates Fundamental Index LP), Cutler Group, LP, Carol E Newman and others
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Trust Company, Board of Administration of the Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan, incorrectly named as "Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Employees Retirement Plan-LCV" and "Water, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and others
Interested Party:
Estate of Robert D. Nelson and Joint Board of Trustees of the Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust, as Administrator of the Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Miles-Baker v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
as 1:2022cv09251
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Miles-Baker
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miles-Baker v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
as 1:2022cv04684
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Miles-Baker
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Novak v. HFR Financial Services / Advisors et al
as 5:2022cv00895
Petitioner:
James E. Novak
Respondent:
HFR Financial Services / Advisors and Charles Schwab
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
