Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Azubuko v. Wilkins
as 19-4045
Respondent:
Court Clerk, Massachusetts' Appeal Court, Douglas H. Wilkins, in individual & offical capacities, Massachusetts Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Azubuko v. Eastern Bank Incorporation
as 19-3827
Petitioner:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Respondent:
Kelly Jordan-Price, in individual & official capacities, Maynard M. Kirpalani, in individual & official capacities and Eastern Bank Incorporation
Azubuko v. University of London
as 19-2623
Petitioner:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Respondent:
University of London, & Educational Testing Service
Azubuko v. Eastern Bank Incorporation et al
as 1:2018cv11029
Defendant:
Kelly Jordan-Price, Maynard M. Kirpalani and Eastern Bank Incorporation
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Azubuko v. University of Londong & Educational Testing Service
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2018cv10890
Defendant:
University of Londong & Educational Testing Service
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Azubuko v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv09992
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Azubuko v. Lifestyle
as 11-3122
Petitioner:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Respondent:
Lifestyle Transportation, Inc, Demoya, Mr. and Ritz Carlton Hotel Inc
Azubuko v. Boston Police Officer et al
as 11-2465
Petitioner:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Respondent:
Boston Police Officer, Number 103743 and Unknown MA's Dorchester Distrcit Court Deputy Clerk
Azubuko v. Massachusetts Port Authority Taxi Dispatcher et al
as 3:2010cv00238
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Defendant:
Massachusetts Port Authority Taxi Dispatcher, Massachusetts Legislators, Jeffrey Mullan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.