Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Pearson v. City of New York
as 24-1167
Plaintiff:
LESTER PEARSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DARCEL CLARK, Bronx County District Attorney; In His Personal Capacity and others
Rivera v. Better Holdco, Inc.
as 1:2023cv10635
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivera
Defendant:
Better Holdco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Richards et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv10220
Plaintiff:
Sherma Richards, Willis Wynne, Charles Agnello and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Pearson v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv10669
Plaintiff:
MR Lester Pearson and Lester Pearson
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Police Department, DARCEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Hedick v. Spradling et al
as 7:2021cv05459
Defendant:
Kathleen Henricksen, Kelly Decker, Port Jervis Community Development Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Eric H. Hedick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
Milord-Francois v. New York State Office of the M
as 20-3646
Defendant / Appellee:
Dennis Rosen, John and Jane Doe, said names being fictitious, the persons intended being those who aided and abetted the unlawful conduct of the named Defendants, Janine Daniels-Rivera and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ferlande Milord-Francois
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03334
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Rivera
as 18-1577
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Rivera
Rivera v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 18-1475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Daniel Rivera
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Bryan's Home Improvement Corp.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
