Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Dees v. Zurlo
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN DEES and ETHAN DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
JILLIAN KNOX, SAMUAL MAXWELL, EMILY WILLIAMS and others
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06268
Plaintiff:
Lester Dee Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Wright v. Farby et al
as 6:2024cv06089
Plaintiff:
Dashawun Wright
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Farby, Corrections Officer Thomas, Corrections Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Pacella v. Hesai Group et al
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Alan Pacella
Petitioner:
King Ho Wong and Michael Dee
Defendant:
Hesai Group, Yifan Li, Louis T. Hsieh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
United States of America v. Boria (Wheeler)
as 24-51
Defendant:
JUAN BENIQUEZ, WILLIS CALDWELL, ANTHONY FIELDS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAMON WHEELER and Ross
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dees et al v. Zurlo et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Dees and Ethan Davis Smith
Defendant:
Michael Zurlo, Jeffrey R. Brown, Jillian Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
B&C KB Holding GmbH v. Goldberg Lindsay & Co. LLC
as 23-1014
Petitioner:
B&C KB Holding GmbH
Respondent:
Goldberg Lindsay & Co. LLC, DBA Lindsay Goldberg, LLC and Michael Dees
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
