Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Strong v. Watson
as 23-7953
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL STRONG
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM WATSON, Lockport City Judge, BRIAN D. SEAMAN, Niagara County District Attorney, SUSAN BJORNHOLM, Assistant District Attorney, Niagara County and others
Strong v. Watson
as 23-124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul Strong
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian D. Seaman, Niagara County District Attorney, Susan Bjornholm, Susan, John Phillips, Assistant District Attorney, Niagara County and others
Defendant:
William Watson, Lockport City Judge
Strong v. Watson et al
as 1:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Paul Strong
Defendant:
William Watson, Brian D. Seaman, Susan Bjornholm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strong v. Municipal City of Lockport et al
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Zhane Y. Strong
Defendant:
Municipal City of Lockport, Municipal County of Niagara, J. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shabazz v. Sharr et al
as 3:2019cv01233
Defendant:
Correction Inc., Carleton J. Giles, DeNote and others
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Cook et al
as 3:2019cv01214
Defendant:
Carmen Sierra, Carleton J. Giles, Joe Garibaldi and others
Plaintiff:
Shaka Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creighton v. The City of New York
as 17-754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Creighton
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Detective Dean Roberts, Shield No. 05861, Detective Glenn Godino, Shield No. 2756 and others
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe #1, P.O. John Doe # 2, P.O. John Doe # 3 and others
Banushi v. City of New York
as 11-636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Banushi
Defendant:
Jane Doe, the same being fictitious and employed to denote a female Police Officer in the company of, and who acted in concert with Police Officer Alvin L. Palmer on 12/14/07 in committing the torts complained of against the Plaintiff
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Alvin L. Palmer, Police Officer, Shield No. 04009 and Equashia Allen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
