Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Giuffre v. Maxwell
as 24-203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE
Appellee:
JOHN DOE 17 and JOHN DOE 73
Defendant / Appellee:
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Respondent:
SHARON CHURCHER and JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Intervenor:
ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, JULIE BROWN and others
Chavez v. American Express et al
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez and Prince of New York
Defendant:
American Express, High Yield Savings, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Giuffre v. Maxwell
as 24-182
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE
Intervenor:
JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, TGP COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and others
Appellee:
JOHN DOE 17 and JOHN DOE 73
Defendant / Appellee:
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Respondent:
SHARON CHURCHER and JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Chavez v. American Express et al
as 1:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
American Express, High Yield Savings, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Cigarette Labeling & Advertising Act
Mellon et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran
as 1:2019cv11767
Plaintiff:
Craig Centro, Harold Hughes, Rosemarie Maggiore and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic Of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Keitt v. John/Jane Doe #4
as 17-1615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Devin Keitt
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Brian S. Fischer, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, State of New York and others
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, #4, as Chancellor of New York City Department of Education, John/Jane Doe, #1, as Principal of Public School 236, John/Jane Doe, #2, Dean and others
Keitt v. John/Jane Doe #4 et al
as 1:2009cv08508
Plaintiff:
Devin Keitt
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe # 1, John/Jane Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
