Cases 1 - 10 of 502
Bechel et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03805
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Bechel, Marcia Hickson, Raven El and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
KAREN CRONIN, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1084
Plaintiff:
MELANIE WEISS, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1042
Plaintiff:
MELANIE WEISS, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Stein v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv02363
Plaintiff:
Herbert Stein
Defendant:
Thomas R. Cangemi, Alessandro P. Dinello, James J. Carpenter and others
Dunn v. M.A.N. Sports LLC,
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dunn
Defendant:
M.A.N. Sports LLC,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ware v. Calistro et al
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Richard Marquell Ware
Defendant:
Eugene Calistro, Joseph Fortini and Kevin J. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wang v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv01422
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang and Herbert Stein
Defendant:
Thomas R. Cangemi, Alessandro P. Dinello, James J. Carpenter and others
Interested Party:
Robert Garfield
Pierce v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Aaron Pierce and Herbert Stein
Defendant:
Thomas R. Cangemi, Alessandro P. Dinello, James J. Carpenter and others
Interested Party:
Robert Garfield
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
