Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Claude v. FCI Danbury
as 3:2024cv00961
Petitioner:
Evens Claude
Respondent:
FCI Danbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gomez v. Cullen
as 24-1455
Defendant:
GEORGE ROBINSON, J.B. FOSTER, HSA, K. SORRELL and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE GOMEZ
Rinaldi v. Warden FCI Otisville
as 1:2024cv02449
Petitioner:
Michael Rinaldi
Respondent:
Warden FCI Otisville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Skountzos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons FCI Otisville Satellite Camp
as 1:2024cv03317
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Skountzos
Other:
FCI Otisville, Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gomez v. Cullen
as 24-906
Defendant:
GEORGE ROBINSON, J.B. FOSTER, HSA, K. SORRELL and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE GOMEZ
Urquizo v. Community Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00909
Defendant:
Community Loan Servicing LLC, Newrez LLC formerly known as New Penn Financial LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Bayview Loan Servicing LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sofia Urquizo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aaron v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Paul Aaron
Defendant:
USA, James H. Garcia, Amos D. Telo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Aaron v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Paul Aaron
Defendant:
USA, John H. Garcia, Amos D. Telo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Goode v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
LASEAN GOODE
Other:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MDC BROOKLYN and others
Defendant:
MDC Brooklyn Warden, FCI Danbury Warden and John & Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Aigbekaen v. Gillepsie
as 24-428
Defendant:
WARDEN, WARDEN, FCI Danbury, GILLEPSIE, Lt., DURANT, Lt. and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
