Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Hankerson v. 23 and me et al
as 1:2024cv01940
Plaintiff:
Theresa Ann Hankerson
Defendant:
23 and me, Ancentry Genetic Date, B.G. Chinos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
FCX Solar, LLC v. FTC Solar, Inc.
as 1:2021cv08766
Plaintiff:
FCX SOLAR, LLC
Defendant:
FTC SOLAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
FCX Solar, LLC v. FTC Solar, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03556
Defendant:
FTC SOLAR, INC.
Plaintiff:
FCX SOLAR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
No v. USA LWS (NYC) et al
as 1:2019cv11674
Defendant:
USA LWS (NYC), FTC, WeWork and others
Plaintiff:
Jeong-Suk No
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FTC Solar Capital XXI, LLC v. MJJP Realty, LLC
as 1:2018cv04237
Plaintiff:
FTC Solar Capital XXI, LLC
Defendant:
MJJP Realty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FTC Solar Capital XXI, LLC v. MJJP Realty, LLC
as 2:2018cv04237
Defendant:
MJJP Realty, LLC
Plaintiff:
FTC Solar Capital XXI, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FTC Capital GMBH v. CBOE Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05041
Defendant:
CBOE Exchange, Inc., Cboe Global Markets, Inc., CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FTC Capital GMBH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Heffley v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv10033
Plaintiff:
Travis Heffley
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Psychology Department - USP Marion, Psychology Department - FTC Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez et al v. New York Hospital Cornell et al
as 1:2016cv05794
Defendant:
102.5 Tampa, 94.1 Tampa, 98.7 Tampa and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Andrew Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FTC Capital GMBH v. Royal Dutch Shell plc et al
as 1:2013cv08151
Plaintiff:
FTC Capital GMBH
Defendant:
Royal Dutch Shell plc, BP PLC, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
