Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Wallen v. Consumer Reports, Inc.
as 23-53
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Wallen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Royce Lader, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Frank Highsmith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Consumer Reports, Inc.
Israel Schvimmer v. Roderick Randall
as 22-2851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Israel Schvimmer and Miriam Schvimmer
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Police Detective Buckner, of the 79th Precinct, David A. Hansell, (Reg. #1950179) individually and as NYC Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services, Rebecca Elizabeth Szewczuk, (Reg. #4686903) individually and as Attorney for NYC ACS-Kings County (Family Court) and Attorney for Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and others
Defendant:
The Office of Court Administration, New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and others
I. (Anonymous) v. The Office of Court Administra
as 20-714
Defendant / Appellee:
Karen McNeely, individually and as Caseworker for NYC-ACS, Carmalita Cyrus, individually and as Supervisor #1 for NYC-ACS, Jeanette Vega-Alvarez, (LIC #041405) individually and as NYC-ACS Supervisor FSU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Miriam Schvimmer and Israel Schvimmer
In Re: Ja Qure Al-Bukhari
as 19-894
Respondent:
Guimond, Lieutanant, Sandone, Correctional Officer, Jeremie St. Pierre and others
Petitioner:
Ja Qure Al-Bukhari, FKA Jerome Riddick
Al-Bukhari v. Corrections
as 19-577
Defendant:
John Doe, 3, All sued in their individual and official capacities, Barbara Savoie, All sued in their individual and official capacities, Henry Falcone and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Ellen Durko, All sued in their individual and official capacities, Jeremie St. Pierre, All sued in their individual and official capacities, William Faneuff, All sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ja Qure Al-Bukhari, FKA Jerome Riddick
In Re: Eliquis (Apixaban)
as 17-3734
Plaintiff:
Michael Sneed, Janet Sneed, Judy Brooks, as proposed Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Brooks, deceased and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pauline Landrum, individually and as Personal Representative of Melvers Landrum, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer Inc. and McKesson Corporation
Defendant:
Does, inclusive 1-100
In Re: Eliquis (Apixban) Produ
as 17-3716
Plaintiff:
Michael Sneed, Janet Sneed, Judy Brooks, as proposed Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Brooks, deceased and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James G. Fair
Defendant - Appellee:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer Inc. and McKesson Corporation
Defendant:
Does, inclusive 1-100
In re: Eliquis (Apixaban) Prod
as 17-3719
Plaintiff:
Michael Sneed, Janet Sneed, Judy Brooks, as Proposed Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Brooks, deceased and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary Reis
Defendant - Appellee:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer Inc. and McKesson Corporation, a corporation
Defendant:
Does 1-100
In Re: Eliquis (Apixaban)
as 17-3722
Plaintiff:
Michael Sneed, Janet Sneed, Judy Brooks, as proposed Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Brooks, deceased and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Radcliffe
Defendant - Appellee:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer Inc. and McKesson Corporation
Defendant:
Does, inclusive 1-100
In re: Eliquis (Apixaban) Prod
as 17-3714
Plaintiff:
Michael Sneed, Janet Sneed, Judy Brooks, as proposed Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Brooks, deceased and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ruth Mingle, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard Mingle, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer Inc. and McKesson Corporation, a corporation
Defendant:
Does 1-100
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
