Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wallace v. All Personal Liability Carriers-Underwriters of Land
as 24-1578
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KENNETH WALLACE, SR. and RONALD HILLIS
Defendant:
ALL PERSONAL LIABILITY CARRIERS-UNDERWRITERS OF LAND, RICHARD SEAKLER, MORTIMER and others
Antar v. Grogins
as 24-910
Plaintiff:
THEODORA F. ANTAR, Individually and as next friend and legal guardian of her minor child A.L. and J.V.
Defendant:
Honorable Judge AUDEN GROGINS, Individually and officially, Honorable Judge SCOTT JONES, Individually and officially, Honorable Judge JANE KUPSON GROSSMAN, individually and officially and others
Antar v. Grogins et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Auden Grogins, Scott Jones, Jane Grossman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. All Personal Liability Carriers-Underwriters of La
as 23-47
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hillis
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Kenneth Wallace, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
All Personal Liability Carriers-Underwriters of Land, Richard Seakler, D. A. Sackler and others
Hillie et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv07919
Plaintiff:
Alan Hillie and Claudia Hillie
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wallace et al v. All Personal Liability Carriers-Underwriters of Land et al
as 1:2022cv08022
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenneth Wallace, Sr. and Ronald Hillis
Defendant:
All Personal Liability Carriers-Underwriters of Land, Richard Seakler, Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kat Florence Design Limited v. Parker et al
as 1:2018cv03653
Plaintiff:
Kat Florence Design Limited
Defendant:
Tandu Productions, Inc., Ms. Sarah Jessica Parker and Sarah Jessica Parker
Counter Defendant:
Kristy Ann Florence Hillis and Kat Florence Co. Ltd. d/b/a Kat Florence Atelier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
