Cases 1 - 10 of 28,212
Pinkney v. Bryant et al
as 1:2024cv04753
Plaintiff:
Steven Pinkney
Defendant:
Douglas Bryant, Joseph Busky, Randall Steward and others
Kennedy v. Rochester & Southern Railroad
as 5:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Kennedy, Jr.
Defendant:
Rochester & Southern Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Maayah v. FAREVA USA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv04731
Plaintiff:
Sofia Maayah
Defendant:
FAREVA USA, INC., CHROMAVIS USA, INC., THIBAUT FRAISSE and others
Riley v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2024cv04732
Plaintiff:
Clayton Riley
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, Police Officer Luis J Sotomayor, Detective Fausto R Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Kelly Colleen Card
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bartoli et al
as 1:2024cv04715
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Bartoli, Edward M. McKenna, Leon Bevans and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Other:
Jeanne Galletta and Mercedes Muentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Lennon v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04707
Plaintiff:
Mary D. Lennon
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405 IRS: Action for recovery of refunds erroneously made
Duplessy v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04370
Plaintiff:
Sergot Duplessy
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Samuels v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv04391
Plaintiff:
Ricardo W Samuels
Defendant:
Manveer Singh, Jaspreet S Chahal and J Cheema Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Andreano v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04393
Plaintiff:
Michael Andreano
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
