Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Wilder v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv01326
Defendant:
Craig Demmon, Justin L. Mitchell, Jane Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Titus Wilder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv07639
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Clinton Thomas, Mr. John Doe #1, C.O. T. Molloy and others
Plaintiff:
Sheldon P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaime v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv01114
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III, C. Witty-Lewis, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crispin v. Sussel
as 24-2094
Defendant:
BIGA, Counselor, JOHN DOE, #1, PEIREAULT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSSEAN CRISPIN
Montes v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv04141
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Germaine Montes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jane Doe 3 v. Indyke et al
as 1:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3
Defendant:
Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bensky et al v. Indyke et al
as 1:2024cv01204
Plaintiff:
Danielle Bensky and Jane Doe 3
Defendant:
Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe 1 et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Olibencia v. Melecio et al
as 9:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Olibencia
Defendant:
P. Melecio, John and/or Jane Doe #1, John and/or Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
