Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cinquemani v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2026cv05693
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Anne Cinquemani
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dees et al v. Eby et al
as 1:2026cv01318
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Dees and Ethan D. Smith
Defendant:
Brett Eby and Saratoga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gillich v. State of New York et al
as 7:2026cv05551
Plaintiff:
Richard Hans Gillich
Defendant:
State of New York, Town of Mount Pleasant, Carl Fulgenzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Komatsu v. United States of America
as 26-1762
Petitioner:
TOWAKI KOMATSU
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERCON SECURITY, CSO LAPTOP and others
Wilson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv05600
Plaintiff:
Rashaad Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden E. Rickard, Officer R. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Jordan v. Department of Correction
as 26-1704
Plaintiff:
VICTOR L. JORDAN, SR.
Defendant:
LAURA M. OLIVARES, GERALD VALLETTA, MD, Dr. CRAIG BURNS, MH and others
Walden v. Clinical Registry Solutions
as 1:2026cv03745
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Walden
Defendant:
CLINICAL REGISTRY SOLUTIONS,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cefaratti v. Ostrover et al
as 1:2026cv05151
Plaintiff:
Michael Cefaratti
Defendant:
Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz, Alan Kirshenbaum and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Munson v. Western New York FBI
as 1:2026cv01240
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Munson
Defendant:
Western New York FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
