Cases 1 - 10 of 1,727
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Roundtree v. Lamont
as 24-1319
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess ANJAKNIE ROUNDTREE, -Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglass, ELIZABETH QUEEN, ANDREW, King and others
Defendant:
NED LAMONT, State of Connecticut's Governor, JEN ZAROZI, State Capitol Police, DEVIN, Officer and others
Jean-Louis v. Board of Education
as 1:2024cv03755
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Jean-Louis
Respondent:
Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORTHROCK MINERALS LLC v. COHEN et al
as 1:2024cv03155
Plaintiff:
NORTHROCK MINERALS LLC
Defendant:
Joseph Cohen and SNOW JOE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
C.O. MS. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ubhi v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv02995
Plaintiff:
Maghar Ubhi
Defendant:
Jaime Leverton, Shenif Visram, Bill Tai and others
Ashton et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02895
Plaintiff:
Diane Ashton and Joe Ashton
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Green (Johnson)
as 24-1017
Defendant:
DARRYL JOHNSON, NORMAN WORKMAN, CLAYTON GREEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Unknown Plaintiff v. Unknown Defendant
as 7:2024cv02882
Plaintiff:
Unknown Plaintiff
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Other:
joe smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3301 Fraudulent Transfer Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
