Cases 1 - 8 of 8
American Beverage Packers Urban Renewal LLC v. Veolia WTS USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
American Beverage Packers Urban Renewal LLC
Defendant:
Veolia WTS USA, Inc., John Does, Veolia WTS USA, Inc. doing business as Veolia Water Technologies & Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04816
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lebetkin v. Giray
as 20-4229
Defendant:
Adile Batuk, Richard B. Feldman, Rosenberg Feldman Smith LLP and others
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe, 1 through 25
Appellant:
Steven Lebetkin
Counter Claimant:
Ayse Giray, AKA Sara Baran
Lebetkin v. Giray
as 20-1374
Defendant:
Adile Batuk, Richard B. Feldman, Rosenberg Feldman Smith LLP and others
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe, 1 through 25
Appellant:
Steven Lebetkin
Counter Claimant:
Ayse Giray, AKA Sara Baran
Lynch v. National Prescription Administ
as 19-523
Defendant / Appellee:
National Prescription Administrators, Inc., Express Scripts, Inc. and John Does, 1 through 25
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Patrick J. Lynch, as Trustee of the Health and Welfare Fund of the Patrolmens's Benevolent Association of the City of New York and The Retiree Health & Welfare Fund of the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, on behalf of himse
Lebetkin v. Giray et al
as 1:2018cv08170
Plaintiff:
Steven Lebetkin
Defendant:
Sassoon & Cymrot, LLP, Aysa Giray, Lewis P. Sassoon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv06118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
