Cases 1 - 10 of 19
United States of America v. Graham
as 24-292
Defendant:
THOMAS DEGREE, JORDAN DAVIS, JOHNNY WILLIAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LAIRON GRAHAM, Shah, Uncle Shah and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Boyde v. Barnes
as 5:2022cv01024
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Defendant:
Detective Andrew Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Graham (Degree)
as 22-1397
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lairon Graham, AKA Shah, Kimberly Udrea, Joseph Ward and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Thomas Degree, AKA Tommy
Boyde v. Fahey
as 22-1367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Johnny William Boyde, AKA Johnny W. Boyde
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph E. Fahey
Boyde v. Fahey
as 5:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde and Johnny W. Boyde
Defendant:
Joseph E. Fahey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyde v. Conway
as 21-2320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Johnny William Boyde
Respondent / Appellee:
Eugene Conway, Warden of the Onondaga County Justice Center
Boyde v. McCarty et al
as 9:2021cv00837
Defendant:
Sergeant L. McCarty, Lisa McCarty, Sergeant Uzunoff and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 9:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center, Deputy Wagner, L. McCarty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 9:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center, City of Syracuse, Deputy Quigley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. Onondaga Justice Center
as 9:2021cv00748
Defendant:
Onondaga Justice Center
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
