Cases 1 - 10 of 2,821
Graf v. Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
as 24-1320
Plaintiff:
KAREN GRAF
Defendant:
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES, INC. and OPRY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP
Shaller v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Karen Shaller
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roach v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03484
Plaintiff:
Karen Roach
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03332
Plaintiff:
Karen Williams and Erik Williams
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
KAREN CRONIN, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Ferguson et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03206
Plaintiff:
Karen Ferguson and Tom Ferguson
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cheng v. United States of America
as 24-1131
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. ANDRE HICKSON, Warden JEAN RENE and others
Cruz v. Board of Elections in the City of New Yok et al
as 1:2024cv03153
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cruz
Defendant:
Board of Elections in the City of New Yok, The City of New York, Karen Koslowithzz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez-Portillo v. Garland
as 24-1117
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN SANCHEZ-PORTILLO, KAREN YANES-SANTOS, ZOE MATUTE-YANES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1084
Plaintiff:
MELANIE WEISS, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
