Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin v. Cioppa et al
as 1:2022cv01988
Plaintiff:
Ling Lin
Defendant:
District Director Thomas Cioppa, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou and Alejandro N. Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gao v. ABC Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv02708
Defendant:
ABC Corp., Jian Ling Lin, Yifudi Lin and others
Plaintiff:
Bin Gao
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07165
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Aasheim et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2017cv05471
Plaintiff:
Jesus Collazo, Emmanuel Amilo, Joan Sciorta and others
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Li et al v. Kai Xiang Dong
as 1:2015cv07554
Plaintiff:
Changxing Li, Guomin Li, Jian Li and others
Defendant:
Kai Xiang Dong, Jane Doe Boss, Iron Sushi Fusion Inc. doing business as Iron Sushi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv09994
Plaintiff:
Mei Ling Lin
Defendant:
City of New York , William Bratton, Russell Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lin v. Holder
as 13-3389
Petitioner:
Yien Lin, AKA Ling Lin, AKA En Yi
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lin v. Holder
as 13-37
Petitioner:
Jian Ling Lin, AKA Jian Ling
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
