Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Soto v. Guez Deli Grocery Corp. (d/b/a LR80 Deli Grocery), et al
as 1:2025cv01243
Plaintiff:
Francy Soto
Defendant:
Guez Deli Grocery Corp. (d/b/a LR80 Deli Grocery),, Luis Rodriguez and Benjamin Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Rodriguez
as 25-172
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05084
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05084
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Canteen et al v. City of New York
as 1:2024cv05371
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Cordero, Adrian Baptiste, Nicholas Condos and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 (a) FLSA: Action for Overtime Wage Violation
United States of America v. Rodriguez
as 24-1569
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Cepeda)
as 24-5
Defendant:
LANDDY RODRIGUEZ, LUIS RODRIGUEZ, REINALDO COLON OLIVERAS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS CEPEDA and Doogie
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodriguez v. Connecticut Renaissance
as 3:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Luis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Connecticut Renaissance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rodriguez v. Balenciaga America, Inc.
as 1:2023cv06695
Plaintiff:
Luis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Balenciaga America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
