Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Me et al v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv05871
Plaintiff: Jane Me, Jane Me1 and Jon Roe
Defendant: United States, U.S. DHS, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
P.L. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E
as 21-825
Plaintiff: J.C., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: R.F.J., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, P.L., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, A.Q., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Director Thomas R. Decker, Director of New York Field Office of ICE, in official capacity, Director Matthew Albence, Director Matthew T. Albence Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement Removal Operations, in official capacity, Daniel J. Daugherty and others
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Barr
as 20-3712
Defendant / Appellant: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Executive Office For Immigration Review, James McHenry, in his official capacity as the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv07517
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
Golding v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv06998
Plaintiff: Karim Golding
Defendant: Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Giron v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv06995
Defendant: Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Plaintiff: Jesus Giron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
State of New York
as 20-2622
Defendant / Appellant: Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Acting Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of New York and Eric Gonzalez, Esq., in his official capacity as the District Attorney of Kings County (Brooklyn)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv06167
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
State of New York v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05349
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew Albence and others
Plaintiff: State of New York
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?