Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 888
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Glanville v. Chex Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03992
Plaintiff: Maurice Glanville
Defendant: Chex Systems, Inc. and Discover Financial Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oparaji v. Home Retention Corp.
as 24-1444
Plaintiff: MAURICE OPARAJI
Defendant: HOME RETENTION CORP., BORCHERT AND LASPINA, PC, ROBERT W. FROMMER and others
Bunten v. Donat
as 24-1344
Plaintiff: REGINALD BROWN, PATRICIA BUNTEN, TAMIE HOLLINS and others
Defendant: JOSEPH DONAT, GEORGE GARRISON, WILLIAM HORTON and others
In Re: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb
as 24-1318
Appellant: RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS, Trust
Defendant: JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Washington v. USA
as 1:2024cv03317
Petitioner: Maurice Washington
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
IN RE: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv03094
Not Yet Classified: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust
Defendant: Jeremiah Darnell Webb, Noah Sencer Robert Barclay, Malakai Levi Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DiBenedetto v. Coley
as 24-1029
Plaintiff: VINCENT DIBENEDETTO
Defendant: MAURICE COLEY, Badge #4013 and NEW YORK STATE POLICE
United States of America v. London
as 24-817
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MAURICE LONDON
Harris v. Doe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff: Maurice D. Harris
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?