Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1662
Plaintiff:
Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Akil Sachveda and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Akhil Sachdeva, Anser Mehmood and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-999
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
James Sherman
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Salvatore LoPresti, MDC Captain
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-981
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Warden Dennis Hasty, former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center(MDC), James Sherman, Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Lavezzari v. Zenk et al
as 1:2010cv02365
Defendant:
Bear, James E. Burrell, Ms. Smolley and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Miranda Lavezzari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lavezzari v. Zenk et al
as 1:2010cv03917
Plaintiff:
Roberto Miranda Lavezzari
Defendant:
Michael Zenk, James E. Burrell, Bear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
-RML Remice v. Zenk et al
as 1:2003cv00286
:
and
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Karleen Toni Remice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. Zenk et al
as 1:2008cv03116
Plaintiff:
Maurice Todd
Defendant:
Michael Zenk, Ernest Abeles, MD, Dr. Brankin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Elmaghraby et al v. Ashcroft et al
as 1:2004cv01809
Plaintiff:
Javaid Iqbal and Ehab Elmaghraby
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Scott Roseberry, David Rardin, Corrections Officer Michael Defrancisco and others
Counter Claimant:
Corrections Officer Reynaldo Alamo
Cross Claimant:
Corrections Officer Jai Jaikisson
Interested Party:
Ibrahim Turkmen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
