Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Livingston v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Joshua Michael Livingston
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Livingston v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Joshua Michael Livingston
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09658
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sx
Hobbs v. Livingston et al
as 1:2020cv00515
Defendant:
Rev. James Forbes, Richard Gregory and Rev. Michael Livingston
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Estate of Gugsa Abraham Dabela et al v. Redding et al
as 3:2016cv00534
Defendant:
Town of Redding , Douglas Fuchs , Ryan Alcott and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Gugsa Abraham Dabela and Abraham Dabela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston
as 1:2015cv03166
Plaintiff:
Michael Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Livingston v. Denault et al
as 2:2015cv03166
Defendant:
Ryan Denault and Scott J. Denault
Plaintiff:
Michael Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Livingston v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03182
Plaintiff:
Michael Livingston
Defendant:
The City of New York and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Local 676 UA et al v. United Assn of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Indus et al
as 3:2010cv00123
Plaintiff:
Local 676 UA, John Livingstone and Michael Livingstone
Defendant:
United Assn of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Indus, William P. Hite, General Executive BD and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
