Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hanson v. Martinez
as 1:2024cv05890
Defendant:
Miguel Martinez
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanson v. Martinez
as 1:2024cv06567
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hanson
Defendant:
Miguel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanson v. Martinez
as 1:2024cv06570
Defendant:
Miguel Martinez
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanson v. Martinez
as 1:2024cv05888
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hanson
Defendant:
Miguel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Gab.K, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Erving Miguel Martinez
Defendant:
Gab.K, LLC doing business as Gabriel Kreuther doing business as Kreuther Handcrafted Chocolate, Teton Restaurant Group, LLC and Gabriel Kreuther
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martinez Abzun v. Garland
as 22-6308
Petitioner:
FERDY MIGUEL MARTINEZ ABZUN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. Ricci et al
as 3:2022cv01468
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
Salvatore L Ricci, Jr and City of New Haven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Beltran
as 22-2320
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Miguel Martinez Beltran, AKA Julio Martinez, AKA Miguel Martinez Beltran, AKA Mario Martinez, AKA Mario Martinez Beltran
Martinez v. Institute for the Puerto Rican/Hispanic Elderly, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04365
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez
Defendant:
Institute for the Puerto Rican/Hispanic Elderly, Inc., ACACIA Network, Inc., Luz M. Chanci Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
