Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01895
Plaintiff:
Anson C. Moody, Jr.
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech, US, Inc., TPG Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moody v. McDonough
as 24-450
Plaintiff:
MARY MOODY
Defendant:
DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, United States Secretary of Veterans Affairs, a Cabinet Member and Chief Executive of the Veterans Affairs, a Federal Agency
Moodie v. James et al
as 1:2023cv10708
Plaintiff:
Donna Hope Moodie
Defendant:
Letitia James and ERISA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moodie v. Attorney General Letitia James
as 1:2023cv06071
Plaintiff:
Ms. Donna H. Moodie
Defendant:
Attorney General Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moodie v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York et al
as 1:2023cv04907
Petitioner:
Donna Hope Moodie
Respondent:
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Bruce Kemp, Richard W. Babinecz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
