Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
The Resource Group International Limited v. Chishti
as 26-2014
Petitioner: THE RESOURCE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Respondent: SARAH POBERESKIN
Defendant: MUHAMMAD ZIAULLAH KHAN CHISHTI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04269
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01106
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04042
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Abdur-Rahman et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2026cv05288
Plaintiff: Deidhra Abdur-Rahman, Chris B Acker, Rafael Acosta and others
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03728
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BARAGE v. NASHLA EXPRESS CORP et al
as 1:2026cv05168
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD BASHER BARAGE
Defendant: NASHLA EXPRESS CORP and ALEJANDRO VILLAR DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
The Resource Group International Limited v. Chishti
as 26-1621
: THE RESOURCE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, TRG PAKISTAN LIMITED, MOHAMMED KHAISHGI and others
Defendant: MOHAMMED ALI JAMEEL and PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL EMERGING MARKETS PARTNERS II, L.P.
Danyal v. Blanche
as 26-1622
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD DANYAL
Respondent: TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Shah v. Blanche
as 26-1623
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD ALI SHAH
Respondent: TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?