Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Moshier v. Samuels et al
as 9:2013cv00989
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Moshier, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Paul M. Laird, Agnus McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simon v. United States of America
as 13-1247
Plaintiff:
Protective Class
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Simon
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, John Doe, United States Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, Rule 35 FRAP En Banc Opinion, #11-5185 and others
Simon et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv05416
Defendant:
2 John Does, Attorney General Eric Holder, John Doe 2nd Circuit U.S. Appeals and others
Plaintiff:
Protective Class and Charles Simon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208 (B) Agency Action Review
Awan v. Lapin et al
as 1:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Khalid Q. Awan
Defendant:
Harley Lapin, D. Scott Dodrill, Paul M. Laird and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sash v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv03106
Plaintiff:
Eliot S. Sash
Defendant:
The United States of America, Barbara Cadogan, Peter Goldstein, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Galan v. Laird
as 1:2008cv00267
Petitioner:
Alonzo Galan
Respondent:
Paul M. Laird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tarafa v. Laird
as 1:2007cv04761
Petitioner:
Eddie Tarafa
Respondent:
Paul M. Laird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tarafa v. Laird
as 1:2007cv02364
Petitioner:
Eddie Tarafa
Respondent:
Paul M. Laird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Laird
as 1:2007cv02020
Petitioner:
Kareem Scott
Respondent:
Paul M. Laird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lepardo v. Laird
as 1:2007cv01211
Petitioner:
Anthony F. Lepardo
Respondent:
Paul M. Laird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
