Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Pitney Bowes Inc. v. Acro Service Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00337
Plaintiff: Pitney Bowes Inc.
Defendant: Acro Service Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gomes v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00978
Plaintiff: Xavier Gomes
Defendant: Pitney Bowes, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Yu v. Pitney Bowes Inc.
as 3:2019cv00244
Plaintiff: Siji Yu
Defendant: Pitney Bowes Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03122
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blair v. Pitney Bowes Inc.
as 3:2010cv01672
Plaintiff: Pamela L. Blair
Defendant: Pitney Bowes Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pitney Bowes Inc. v. Broadvision Inc.
as 1:2010cv00637
Plaintiff: Pitney Bowes Inc.
Defendant: Broadvision Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kings Choice Neckwear, Inc. v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.
as 10-260
Plaintiff - Appellant: Kings Choice Neckwear, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee: Pitney Bowes, Inc., Pitney Bowes Credit Corporation and Pitney Bowes Global Financial Services, LLC
Rade et al v. Pitney Bowes Inc et al
as 3:2009cv02023
Plaintiff: Henry M. Rade, Henry M. Rade and Nancy MacDougall
Defendant: Pitney Bowes Inc, Bruce P. Nolop, Michael J. Critelli and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund v. Pitney Bowes, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01740
Plaintiff: NECA-IBEW Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant: Pitney Bowes, Inc, Murray D. Martin and Bruce Nolop
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv08968
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?