Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Murphy v. Rodriguez et al
as 7:2023cv06998
Plaintiff:
Adam E. Murphy
Defendant:
ERT Medical Officer K. Rodriguez, ERT Officer Pullen, ERT Officer Prelvukaj and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pullen v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Mark Pullen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Civil Action to Recover Money
Bronfman v. Pullen et al
as 3:2023cv00619
Petitioner:
Clare Bronfman
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bryan Antonelli and others
Defendant:
Richard Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Self v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Darrell Self
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Saleem v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00147
Petitioner:
Muhammad Saleem
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alkafi v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Kasan Alkafi
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Giovinco v. Pullen
as 23-251
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles Anthony Giovinco
Respondent / Appellee:
Timethea Pullen, Warden
Pittman v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01651
Petitioner:
Marlo Pittman
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Raynor v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01609
Petitioner:
Alicia Raynor and Alicia Nicole Raynor
Defendant:
Pullen
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boehm v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Brian Boehm
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
