Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Smith v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PrecisionWorks MFG, LLC et al v. Union Funding Source, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08290
Plaintiff:
PrecisionWorks MFG, LLC, Robert M. Smith and Gregory S Gernert
Defendant:
Union Funding Source, Inc., Cloudfund LLC, Kalamata Capital Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith v. Air & Liquid Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00217
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler, LLC, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., CBS Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Smith v. Primecare Medical, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv06396
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Primecare Medical, Inc. and Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Costello et al
as 6:2017cv06759
Petitioner:
Robert E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Costello, Patrick M. O'Flynn and Monroe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Smith et al
as 9:2017cv00258
Petitioner:
Robert F. Smith
Respondent:
Brandon Smith, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Flynn et al
as 1:2016cv09242
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Smith
Defendant:
Rita Flynn, Jennifer Armstrong, Carl DuBois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. First Niagara Bank N.A.
as 6:2016cv06027
Plaintiff:
Lisa Anne Smith and Robert Jeffrey Smith
Defendant:
First Niagara Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gil v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv09611
Plaintiff:
Clemencia Gil
Defendant:
Western Express, Inc. and Robert E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
