Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Chipman et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2024cv05839
Plaintiff:
Richard Chipman, Mohammad Akram, Asare Bekoe and others
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00732
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Branch (Munoz)
as 24-1987
Defendant:
YACKEEM MCFARLANE, ALLEN COLON, FAHEEM TAYLOR and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Terrell (Thomas)
as 24-1632
Defendant:
ISAIAH THOMAS, BOSS TERRELL, YAUREL CENTENO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kasilingam v. Tilray, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03459
Defendant:
Brendan Kennedy, Mark Castaneda and Tilray, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ganesh Kasilingam, Leslie Rose, Surinder Chandok and others
Petitioner:
Tariq Rasheed, Joe Dong, Brett Mitchell and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05821
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ahmad v. Girardi et al
as 2:2023cv03711
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Ahmad
Defendant:
Judge Joseph B. Girardi, Police Officer Stevenson Barnes, P.O. J.P. Laurino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Google LLC v. Saeed et al.
as 1:2023cv03369
Plaintiff:
ABC and Google LLC
Defendant:
DEF, Zubair Saeed, Raheel Arshad and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ahmad v. Girardi et al
as 1:2023cv03797
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Ahmad
Defendant:
Judge Joseph B. Girardi, Police Officer Stevenson Barnes, Police Officer J. Paul Lauriono and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ahmad v. Girardi et al
as 1:2023cv03711
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Ahmad
Defendant:
Judge Joseph B. Girardi, Police Officer Stevenson Barnes, P.O. J.P. Laurino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
