Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hall v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv02308
Defendant:
C.O. Does, Warden Clement Glenn, Medical Does and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Ramos et al
as 1:2019cv07064
Defendant:
Capt. Shaw, Dr. Raul Ramos, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Ramos et al
as 1:2019cv06419
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Raul Ramos, City of New York and Christopher LaRosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Ramos et al
as 1:2019cv06283
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rice
Defendant:
Raul Ramos, The City of New York and Ross Macdonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv03967
Defendant:
Raul Ramos, Department of Corrections, NYC Health and Hospitals and others
Plaintiff:
Mikel Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Ramos et al
as 1:2019cv03836
Plaintiff:
Carlton Gray
Defendant:
Dr. Raisa Katz, P.A. David Onuora, MH. Amber Testa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Ramos et al
as 1:2019cv03136
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Corrections, Nichole Adams-Flores, Correction Officer Wadley and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lebron v. Ramos
as 1:2019cv02598
Defendant:
M.D. Raul Ramos
Plaintiff:
Richard Lebron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv09709
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smickle v. Ponte
as 18-1038
Plaintiff:
Donovan Bryant, Luis Cintron and Quindell Hill
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randel Smickle
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York, New York City Department of Correction, Environmental Health, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Commissioner, Patricia legoff, Assistant Commissioner, EEO, James Patrick, PA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
