Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Randall v. Oneil
as 23-7616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARROD CARL RANDALL and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant / Appellee:
COLLEEN M. ONEIL, Former Sheriff, BRIAN R. MCDERMOTT, Former Under-Sheriff, PETER R. BARNETT, Sheriff and others
Randall v. Oneil et al
as 9:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Carl Randall and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant:
Colleen M. Oneil, Brian R. McDermott, Peter R. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Oneil et al
as 9:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Carl Randall and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant:
Colleen M. Oneil, Brian R. McDermott, Peter R. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01372
Defendant:
City of New York, Sgt. Terry O'Connor, P.O. Jimmy Ponce and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03069
Defendant:
City of New York, Todd Cracco, Glemaud Fritz and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03070
Defendant:
P.O. Tina P. Everett, Det. Ylka R. Morales, Supervisor P.O. John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rose and Wayne Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vitale AML Consultants, Inc. v. Promontory Financial Group, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv01315
Plaintiff:
Vitale AML Consultants, Inc. and Vitale AML Consultants, Inc.
Defendant:
Promontory Financial Group, LLC, Promontory Financial Group, LLC, Promontory Financial Group, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Ronald Rose, AML Consulting Service, Inc, Hani Samaan and others
Counter Defendant:
Vitale AML Consultants, Inc., Vitale AML Consultants, Inc., Vitale AML Consultants, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
