Cases 1 - 10 of 761
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vidal et al v. Isabel's Day Care Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03901
Plaintiff:
Ruth Vidal, Elizabeth Carias and Maria Morfin
Defendant:
Isabel's Day Care Inc and Isabel Nino Rodriguez
Tiffany Simone Fulton et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01606
Plaintiff:
Central Harlem Community (District 10), Silent Voices United Inc., St. Nicholas Houses Resident Association and others
Defendant:
City of New York, James Equities LLC, Douglas C. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leon Forero v. Garland
as 24-901
Petitioner:
RUTH ANDREA LEON FORERO, MIA SARITA FORERO LEON and DILAN JOSEP FORERO LEON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Anapol v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Ruth Anapol
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Ruth Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
