Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Students for Fair Admissions v. United States Military Academy at West Point
as 24-40
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY AT WEST POINT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, LLOYD AUSTIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense and others
Emrit v. Secretary of the Army
as 23-586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee:
Secretary of the Army
Emrit v. Secretary of the Army
as 1:2023cv02547
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Secretary of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Secretary of the Army
as 1:2022cv00943
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Secretary of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rucker v. Esper
as 21-2540
Petitioner / Appellant:
Randal Rucker
Respondent / Appellee:
Mark T. Esper, Secretary of the Army Department of the Army, Mark Averill and The Honorable James Mattis
Defendant:
Department of Army, Department of Defense and United States of America
Yancey v. Whitley
as 1:2021cv02374
Plaintiff:
TONY V. YANCEY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WHITLEY, Acting Secretary of the Army and John E. Whitley
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Dedjoe v. Esper
as 19-661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benjamin A. Dedjoe
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Mark T. Esper, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Army
Del Conte v. Honorable John M. McHugh, Secretary of the Army
as 7:2012cv01288
Plaintiff:
Laurie A. Del Conte
Respondent:
Honorable John M. McHugh, Secretary of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Del Conte v. Honorable John M. McHugh, Secretary of the Army
as 6:2012cv06311
Plaintiff:
Laurie A. Del Conte
Defendant:
Honorable John M. McHugh, Secretary of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
