Cases 1 - 10 of 485
Burgison v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Raymond Burgison
Defendant:
Deron Smith, Blevons, Quaid Cohleymore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Treadwell et al
as 3:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Marc T. Treadwell, Charles H. Weigle, Sonja Profit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New Neighborhoods, Inc. v. Thrifteasta, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
NEW NEIGHBORHOODS, INC and New Neighborhoods, Inc.
Defendant:
THRIFTEASTA, LLC and Charnina Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Default
Smith v. Osborn Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Tyrone J Smith
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. New Neighborhoods, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Charnina Smith
Defendant:
New Neighborhoods, Inc., Downtown West Gate Apts, L.P. and Downtown West Gate Apartments, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Osborn CI
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Smith, Jr. II and Charles D. Smith, Jr II
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharpe v. Sharpe et al
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Nautasha Sharpe
Defendant:
Mary Sharpe, Henry Winlarski, Foyes Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Smith v. Stover
as 3:2023cv01645
Petitioner:
Brenda Ann Smith
Respondent:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Branden Smith
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
