Cases 1 - 10 of 100
StarNet Insurance Company as asignee and subrogee of Endotronix, Inc. v. Auche
as 7:2026cv06368
Plaintiff:
StarNet Insurance Company as asignee and subrogee of Endotronix, Inc.
Defendant:
Sarah Auche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Wong v. Agency Within, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv04477
Plaintiff:
William Wong
Defendant:
Agency Within, LLC, Joe Yakuel, Sarah O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Richey
as 26-2017
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SARAH RICHEY, COREY WADE, RACHEL GORDON and others
The Resource Group International Limited v. Chishti
as 26-2014
Petitioner:
THE RESOURCE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Respondent:
SARAH POBERESKIN
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD ZIAULLAH KHAN CHISHTI
Aptaker v. Samet et al
as 1:2026cv06217
Plaintiff:
Lisa Aptaker, MD
Defendant:
Judah Samet, Sarah Samet, Francisco Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv01477
Plaintiff:
Sarah Joy Matthews
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hartman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv01474
Plaintiff:
Sarah Lee Hartman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
