Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Shand v. Burgos et al
as 3:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Defendant:
Ruben Burgos, Mark Bounaventure, Jamal Linen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv08701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Shand v. White Glove Community Care Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06635
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Shand and Stephanie Cohen
Defendant:
White Glove Community Care Inc. and Meir Lefkowitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shand v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv07479
Plaintiff:
Blair Shand
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Shand v. Butricks et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Defendant:
Kenneth Butricks, Jennifer Peterson, Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayle v. Harry's Nurses Registry
as 21-1463
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maud Samedi, Debbie Ann Bromfield, Rose-Marie Zephirin and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Harry's Nurses Registry, Harry Dorvilien and Harry Dorvilier
Shand v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00523
Defendant:
Syed Johar Nagvi, Ruiz, Doran and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shand v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2021cv00119
Defendant:
McLeod, Kyle Magoon, Kristin Carabine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shand v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2020cv01268
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez, Derrick Molden and Alphonso Lindsey
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
